External & internal network testing
Understand what an attacker could reach from outside your organization or from an agreed starting point inside the network.
Evaluate in-scope systems, exposed services and configurations, and validate exploitable weaknesses and combinations that could increase access or impact.
See the affected systems, supporting evidence and remediation priorities, with the testing perspective and scope made clear.
Web application testing
Understand how weaknesses in an application could affect its users, information and business workflows.
Assess agreed application functions, authentication and access controls, considering what different users should be able to see or do. The application boundaries and access provided are defined during scoping.
Give your application team actionable findings and remediation guidance tied to the behavior and impact observed during testing.
Wireless security assessment
Understand the security risks associated with access to your wireless environment.
Evaluate access and configuration risks within agreed wireless networks. Identify the environments and boundaries to be assessed before testing, rather than assuming every location or wireless system is included.
Use the resulting findings to prioritize changes to wireless access and configuration within the tested scope.
Active Directory assessment
Understand how identity weaknesses could give an attacker more access than intended.
Assess agreed identity configurations and attack paths. Areas illustrated in RMC’s sample report include elevated account use, certificate templates and directory configuration; the actual focus depends on your environment.
Connect technical identity findings to potential privilege escalation and practical remediation priorities.
Red & purple team exercises
Explore how agreed attack paths relate to your defensive visibility and response.
Define the exercise objectives, starting access, authorized activity and defender involvement. Red-team work evaluates attack paths against those objectives; purple-team work brings testing and defenders together to examine detection and response.
Understand observed gaps and improvement opportunities in the context of the exercise. Activities and reporting are set by the agreed scope.
Remediation validation
Determine whether changes have addressed previously identified weaknesses.
Reassess the specific findings and affected systems agreed for validation after remediation. This is a focused follow-up to those findings, rather than an assumption that every part of the environment is being tested again.
Distinguish validated fixes from findings that still need attention. Remediation retesting is offered as a separately scoped follow-up, not included in the primary assessment.